Coveralls

What do you like best?

- What I like best is the web-accessible HTML report I can generate from it which shows very comprehensible and detailed information about the test coverage of all the files in my project.

- it has great integration with popular CI services and programming languages

- Nice documentation

What do you dislike?

What I dislike is the unclear integration with Gitlab. On the documentation is says "Gitlab support coming very soon!" but opening my account, I see an icon in the top-left saying that "Link to Gitlab".

A clarification would be great for the users.

Recommendations to others considering the product:

If you are looking to enhance your customer's satisfaction by providing quality assurance for them, then coveralls is the go to. It's got your codes covered.!!

What problems are you solving with the product? What benefits have you realized?

I work at a software development company where developers are developed/trained to work on both internal and external projects for customers who are partners with the company.

While working on these projects, Coveralls badge is added to the Repos providing software quality assurance for the partners. It provides an analysis to determine testing completeness.

This shows to the partners that the product is reliable hence enhances the partners' satisfaction.