IBM Security Verify Access

Provides access management and multi-factor authentication (MFA) to help organizations maintain security as they adopt new technologies.

Languages supported: Czech, German, English, French, Hungarian, Italian, Japanese, Korean, Polish, Russian, Spanish, Chinese (Simplified), Chinese (Traditional)

8.0/10 (Expert Score) ★★★★★
Product is rated as #35 in category Identity and Access Management (IAM) Software
Ease of use
7.6
Support
7.9
Ease of Setup
7.0

Images

Check Software Images

IBM Security Verify Access, formerly IBM Security Access Manager or ISAM, helps you simplify your users’ access while more securely adopting web, mobile, IoT and cloud technologies. It can be deployed on-premises, in a virtual or hardware appliance or containerized with Docker. Verify Access helps you strike a balance between usability and security through the use of risk-based access, single sign-on, integrated access management control, identity federation and mobile multi-factor authentication. Take back control of your access management with Verify Access.

IBM Security Verify Access
IBM Security Verify Access

Show more categories

Customer Reviews

IBM Security Verify Access Reviews

Patrick D. G.

Advanced user of IBM Security Verify Access
★★★★★
TAM | Worth the Premium

What do you like best?

Using RSA, Citrix and several other platforms in a mix of solutions, i find Tivoli to be the most granular from a admin point of view and most simple, secure, at the customer/end-user level.

What do you dislike?

I only dislike the pricing schematics and how we renew our subs and support every year. The unit structure I find complicated and expensive. It is quite possible not utilizing all the MFA, SSO feature sets to their fullest but I understand that could be a conversation to have at the partner level.

Recommendations to others considering the product:

Leverage partner and manufacturer pre-sales, implementation and knowledge transfer resources as much as you can upfront and budget 10-15% if you feel you require more for professional services.

What problems are you solving with the product? What benefits have you realized?

We originally were using OKTA for dashboards and a sandbox for our users to VPN to. Interface alone did not take to our end users 'likability'. Not to mention apps, folders, files would be constantly shared between local and cloud storage and data disparity in/externally was imminent.

Review source: G2.com

Leave a reply

Your total score

B2B Software Guide