Construction Loan Manager

What do you like best?

I cherish the simplicity of transferring archives to the record focus. Having the capacity to see archives got for the record in the report focus and speaking with the commentator through the correspondence log is an incredible advantage.

What do you dislike?

The perceivability to see every single dynamic record in your pipeline is a component that need improvement. As it stands today that perceivability does not exist. So as a bank we need to physically follow the majority of our dynamic documents until the last audit has been given.

Recommendations to others considering the product:

Whatever Construction Loan Manager lacks, they continually strive to do better and honestly seem to value their customers input, so I think its definitely worth it.

What problems are you solving with the product? What benefits have you realized?

In general, this is an extraordinary program. Be that as it may, there are inadequacies that have been a disillusioning revelation over the long haul. There are reports that have adequate pictures, adequate notes, and return to us in a convenient way and that is GREAT! Notwithstanding, there are those cases (that are more incessant than we might want) that return late, missing things, and have rare notes that don't give us a reasonable image of the what the examiner has seen. Those truly mess us up. We are on a tight calendar and slip-ups like that cost us the trust of our borrowers. We have guaranteed to convey on a particular timetable on the off chance that they do all that we have asked, and when we can't convey, it harms our believability.