What do you like best?
What I like the best is that Microsoft gives base-level framework measurements and logs for most administrations in Microsoft Azure. It is future good Azure Services that don't yet place their information into Azure Monitor will put it there later on. It permits us to give complete alarming and observing of Azure infra. I can see every time a process from my scheduled tasks has run and easily dive into the results from each process.
What do you dislike?
It is very tedious to assemble all the measurements. It isn't yet perfect with all items starting at yet. They are attempting to furnish similarity with all items. The interface to azure can be slow and it sometimes takes a while to dig into the results and see all the relevant data.
Recommendations to others considering the product:
It gives far-reaching experiences about logs, errors and assists with arranging alerts for additional remediation. It is a piece tedious and comprehensive to configure all the metrics. I would recommend it.
What problems are you solving with the product? What benefits have you realized?
I conveyed a script that ran on azure functions every 30 minutes, and the monitor had the option to tell me the outcomes after each run. I didn't just have a local log document, the advantage was that the logs and all the program execution information were accessible on the cloud. Managed Services Monitoring of Azure Infra. I screen numerous measurements utilizing this. For data about any of my asset, the screen log contains data, for example, times when assets are made or crushed. So this encourages me to monitor any assets made or wrecked. I can alter our inclinations as indicated by the costing anticipated later on.